Sami Trabelsi Sentenced In Absentia to Two Years in Prison and Half a Million Tunisian Dinars Fine (1.6 Million Moroccan Dirhams) - Elbotola
Elbotola Logo
Sami Trabelsi Sentenced In Absentia to Two Years in Prison and Half a Million Tunisian Dinars Fine (1.6 Million Moroccan Dirhams)

Sami Trabelsi Sentenced In Absentia to Two Years in Prison and Half a Million Tunisian Dinars Fine (1.6 Million Moroccan Dirhams)

T.E (Elbotola)
02 April 2026at19:23

The Criminal Chamber for Financial Corruption Cases at the Tunis Court of First Instance has sentenced former international player and ex-coach of the Tunisian national team, Sami Trabelsi, in absentia to two years in prison, in addition to a substantial financial fine.

Trabelsi's case, along with several other individuals, was referred to the same Criminal Chamber for trial on charges related to customs and banking offenses.

The financial penalties imposed on Sami Trabelsi have exceeded 500,000 Tunisian Dinars (approximately 1.6 million Moroccan Dirhams).

The two-year prison sentence, handed down in absentia, stems from a company established by the former Tunisian national team coach. After the company's closure, accumulated debts and financial irregularities were not settled, leading to suspicions of "financial corruption."

What legal action was taken against Sami Trabelsi?

Former Tunisian national team coach Sami Trabelsi was sentenced in absentia to two years in prison by the Tunis Court of First Instance. This ruling also included a substantial financial fine for charges related to customs and banking offenses.

Why was Sami Trabelsi sentenced in absentia?

Sami Trabelsi was sentenced in absentia due to financial irregularities and unsettled debts from a company he established. After the company's closure, these issues led to suspicions of financial corruption, prompting the court's decision.

How did Sami Trabelsi's case come to trial?

Sami Trabelsi's case, along with several other individuals, was referred to the Criminal Chamber for Financial Corruption Cases. He faced trial on charges specifically related to customs and banking offenses, leading to the recent verdict.