AS Refereeing Expert: "Real Madrid Player Fouled Celta Vigo Player Before Valverde's Goal!" - Elbotola
Elbotola Logo
AS Refereeing Expert: "Real Madrid Player Fouled Celta Vigo Player Before Valverde's Goal!"

AS Refereeing Expert: "Real Madrid Player Fouled Celta Vigo Player Before Valverde's Goal!"

T.E (Elbotola)
06 March 2026at22:38

Former Spanish referee Iturralde González, who analyzes refereeing decisions for Spanish newspaper "AS" and radio station "Cadena SER," discussed the controversial officiating incidents during the La Liga Matchday 27 clash between Celta Vigo and visitors Real Madrid.

Iturralde believes that Real Madrid's winning goal should have been disallowed due to a foul committed in the play leading up to the ball hitting the net.

The former referee stated: "It's a completely clear foul on Fer López (Celta player). Manuel Ángel (Real Madrid player) did not touch the ball; he then lifts his right leg and brings down the Celta player. It is a foul."

Real Madrid ultimately secured a 2-1 victory over hosts Celta Vigo, with Federico Valverde scoring the decisive goal in the 90+5th minute.

What was the controversy surrounding Real Madrid's winning goal against Celta Vigo?

The controversy surrounding Real Madrid's winning goal against Celta Vigo involves a foul claim. A refereeing expert believes the decisive goal should have been disallowed due to a clear foul on a Celta player in the build-up, prior to the ball entering the net.

How did the controversial decision impact the final score of the Real Madrid vs Celta Vigo match?

The controversial decision directly impacted the final score, as Real Madrid secured a 2-1 victory over Celta Vigo. The goal in question was the decisive strike, scored late in the match, which ultimately sealed the win for the visitors.

What are the implications of the refereeing expert's analysis for future La Liga matches?

The implications of the refereeing expert's analysis for future La Liga matches highlight ongoing scrutiny of officiating. Such detailed post-match breakdowns by former officials often fuel debate and pressure for greater consistency in decision-making, influencing future reviews.